British Blue PLC
- Flight Control
213c, Upper West
Tring Crescent,
Westminster,
London,
EC1 1UP
Dear Sir,
Re: United
Kingdom Airspace.
You may be unaware that the second
Thatcher Government privatised the sky over the United Kingdom and Northern
Ireland, incorporating Wales and its Territorial Waters. Consequent upon this
was the stablishment of "British Blue' which finally came to the stock
market early this year. Accordingly your recent letter to the Office of
the Prime Minister has arrived upon my
desk.
In your letter to us, you refer to
information passed to you by persons of your own, occasional, aquaintance who
patronise the 'Independant' newspaper, and you raise the matter of future
changes of Regulation with respect to air transit above the UK & NI, incorporating Wales & its Territorial Waters.
I can confirm that your access to
the 'Casual Annual Permission Without Any Prior Application' (CAPWAPA) facility
is to be withdrawn effective as from September.
You will recall that the 'Air
Traffic and Flight Navigation (1915); Assorted Regulations Applicable To Air
Freight By Abnormal Methods Of Propulsion', was enacted by His Majesties
Govenment, during the First (or Great) War. Covered by these (then) emergency
regulations were all active, and proposed, 'Vehicles capable of
Sustained Levitation by means of Propulsion Systems other than Mechanical
(VcoSLbmoPSotM)'.
For your information, having
legislated upon the matter of the suppression of aircraft noise from 'Residences
of Persons of Note and the Need for Undisturbed Game', by the inclusion of a
sub-clause in the 'Air Transport: Air Fund Tax - Exemptions (Bombers, Fighters
and Reconnaisance Aeroplanes)' bill (enacted 23/07/16), Parliament then
responded to the lobby from the 'United Kingdom
National Association (Incorporating Wales) of Pigeon Fanciers'. The UKNA(IW)OPF 'Massed-Basket' event in
Trafalgar Square (11/04/17) served both to highlight the splendid job its
members were doing by providing a means of
Rapid Information Transfer (RIT) between the front line and the War
Office and to confuse the resident, non-aligned, Trafalgar Square population.
During the ensuing Debate the words
of Algernon Fitzwilliam Penworthy; member for Strawbotham, proved pivotal.
"Mr. Speaker, I must tell the House the opinion of no less an expert on
Pigeons than Mr. Albert Green of Dankwater View in my constituency. He contends
that it is not known by what method pigeons navigate. It is his conclusion,
therefore, that it is foolish for the Law to seek to regulate the flight
directions of feathered spirits." (Hansard 19/5/17) The House accepted this and agreed that by
incorporating the word 'designed' within the leglation, Pigeons and
Pigeon-fanciers would thus become dis-applied and therefore exempt.
Having conducted extensive
research, I confirm, as you rightly pointed-out, that members of the 'English,
Scottish and Northern-Ireland (Incorporating Wales) Falconers League'
(ES&NI(iW)FL) successfully argued, at the time, that the legislation
applied equally to them - in the matter of their Falcons.
I am pleased to report that your
correspondence, with reference to your own predicament, came to light, quite co-incidentley, with a copy of each of the replies to you from the Ministers
for War, Home Affairs, Transport, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and
Hunting, Shooting and Fishing (HS&F). I note that they concurred with your argument and
effectively exempted you and your International Enterprise, forthwith.
Subsequent to this, Govenment
commissioned considerable and learned research into air transport. In his
report to Parliament, 'The Expansion In The Use Of Aeroplanes, Hot-Air-Balloons
And Airships; And The Prediction Of Intraference With Other Significant Bodies
In Flight: The Need For A Concept Of Sky-Density' (which subsequently became known as the
'TEITUOAHABAAATPOIWOSBIF:TNFACOSD Report'), University of Wigan Press, 1928,
Professor Karl Nummerzwei Kleinersdorf Schwartzfeuer showed a collision risk
factor of slightly less than 0.00034 whilst illustrating his proposed Sky-Density
Factor of 2. You will, no doubt, recall his (Chapter 87) analysis which concluded that,
since your activities were limited to the few hours before midnight on Chrismas
Eve, the Sky-Density Factor Fluctuation Index would not vary by more than +/-
3.795. (It was later qualified by a deviation of 0.00009, after the University
of Uttoxeter (Staffs) concluded that a variation of +/- 53.7% was required to
model those commercial pilots who prefered to be at home for Christmas.)
This was considered to be well
within acceptable limits and the 'Select Committee on Flying Planes, Objects
and Other Things' continued to over-look your contribution to air congestion on
Christmas Eve.
During the Second World War, whilst
a rapid development in aircraft design took place, Parliament was disinclined to look
again at the regulations, since the forward propulsion method of aircraft
continued to be by propellor.
However, as I am sure you are
aware, since the end of the Second World War the turbo-prop and jet have been
developed as alternative means of increasing flying speeds in the Commercial
and Military Sector and I note, with regret, that the contents of your letter
are unable to assure me that your traditional propulsion units are currently
able to keep pace with these developments.
Please find, enclosed, copies of
Flight Plan Application Forms AS8a, Fc7b(sub), DR3b(special), GFT45(holiday)
and BDJ-7.9.3 (low-level: winter). I also enclose, for your interest, a copy of
MN45f-s(alternative date).
You should complete, sign, and
submit the relevant documents not later than 9 weeks before the event.
You should also enclose your
remittance in the sum of £3,476.92 (+VAT).
Yours
faithfully,
F.T.S/S.
The Hon.
Ffortesque Timothy Smythe-Smythe.
N.B. Failure to comply with the
Regulations of BritishBlue, its Partners, Subsidiaries and PALS will result in
the Cancellation of your Flights.
No comments:
Post a Comment